<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>PacketSource Forums</title>
<link>http://forums.packetsource.com</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<title>Google has a veterans day logo</title>
<description>Thanks Google!

[url]http://www.google.com/logos/veterans07.gif[/url]</description>
<link>http://forums.packetsource.com/open-topics/google-has-a-veterans-day-logo-22.html</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 15:20:26 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://forums.packetsource.com/details/google-has-a-veterans-day-logo-22.html</guid>
</item>

<item>
<title>How did you get started</title>
<description>For those of you who do security for a living how did you get started?</description>
<link>http://forums.packetsource.com/cerifications-and-career/how-did-you-get-started-21.html</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 15:00:34 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://forums.packetsource.com/details/how-did-you-get-started-21.html</guid>
</item>

<item>
<title>Have any quesitons?</title>
<description>Do you have a question about security certifications? Do you want to ask career advice and other people's experiences?

You've come to the right place!</description>
<link>http://forums.packetsource.com/cerifications-and-career/have-any-quesitons-20.html</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 14:59:54 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://forums.packetsource.com/details/have-any-quesitons-20.html</guid>
</item>

<item>
<title>NSA-IAM</title>
<description>Because i had this training, I thought it would be good to write a little something about it.

--
Mitchell



On May 22, 1998 President Clinton signed Presidential Decision Directive 63 (PPD 63). This directive outlined the civilian and governmental responsibility of protecting the US Critical Infrastructure and established the framework for the National Infrastructure Assurance Plan. One portion of the National Infrastructure Assurance Plan mandates that the National Security Agency (NSA) will perform information security assessments of US Government systems. This assessment became known as the NSA's Infosec Assessment Methodology (IAM)

Because PDD 63 encompasses such a large number of organizations NSA could not adequately perform the IAM for all of them. Because of this the NSA developed the Infosec Assessment Training and Rating Program (IATRP). The IATRP consist of two parts, the first part is a course designed to train Infosec professionals in the IAM. The second part is a "train the trainer" course the NSA conducts to appraise the Infosec Assessment Capability Maturity Model (IA-CMM.)

The NSA Infosec Assessment is conducted by a team of individuals who review the information system security posture of an organization to identify potential vulnerabilities and recommending steps for eliminating or mitigating those vulnerabilities.

The IAM consists of 18 core subjects; however these may be modified to ensure the assessment addresses any organization specific elements. These initial 18 core subjects consist of:


Documentation

Roles &amp; Responsibilities

Identification &amp; Authentication

Account Management

Session Controls

External Connectivity

Telecommunications

Auditing

Virus Protection

Contingency Planning

Maintenance

Configuration Management

Back-ups

Labeling

Media Sanitization/Disposal

Physical Environment

Personnel Security

Training &amp; Awareness


The assessment consists of three phases; the pre-assessment phase, on-site visit, and post assessment phase.

The pre-assessment phase lasts for one or two days. This is the time to get an understanding of a customer's mission and organization, and introduce the team to any key points of contacts at the site. Also during this phase the team performing the IAM determines the customer's needs, begins a criticality matrix of the customer's information, identifies the system to be assessed, coordinates logistics with the customer, and devises an assessment plan.

From this visit the assessment team determines information criticality, systems criticality, and any special considerations. The team establishes the scope of the assessment and requests necessary system documentation from the customer.

After the initial visit, there is a two to four week period in which the assessment team reviews documentation, conducts a preliminary analysis of the system, establishes the activities to be conducted during the on-site activities phase of the assessment, and formalizes the written Assessment Plan Outline which documents:


Important Points of Contact

Organizational Mission

Organizational Information Criticality

System(s) Information Criticality

Customer Concerns

System Configuration

Individuals and Positions to be Interviewed

Documents Reviewed

Timeline of Events


The on-site activities phase usually lasts one or two weeks and allows the team to explore and confirm the information received during the pre-assessment phase, perform validation through interviews with personnel, review of the organizations documentation, view various demonstrations, and to provide initial analysis and feedback to the customer.

The post-assessment phase may last five or six weeks, and allows the team to review any additional documentation, perform further analysis based on information gathered during the on-site visit, finalizes its analysis. At the conclusion of this stage the Assessment team will prepare the final report and present it's to the</description>
<link>http://forums.packetsource.com/cerifications-and-career/nsa-iam-19.html</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 14:58:38 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://forums.packetsource.com/details/nsa-iam-19.html</guid>
</item>

<item>
<title>Whats the best security certifications</title>
<description>Theres plenty of alphabet soup certifications out there now for security pros (CISSP, SSCP, CEH, all of the SANS certs, etc) Which ones are best for which jobs, i mean i've heard CISSP is gunned for by more of a manager type than a field consultants, and the CEH is pretty worthless when it comes to the resume. Anyone with these certs or others be able to clear up the rumors? How much more valuable do some of these certs make you in the eyes of a potential employer? Was it worth it?</description>
<link>http://forums.packetsource.com/cerifications-and-career/whats-the-best-security-certifications-18.html</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 14:56:22 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://forums.packetsource.com/details/whats-the-best-security-certifications-18.html</guid>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>